Burkholderia pseudomallei multi-centre study to establish EUCAST MIC and zone diameter distributions and epidemiological cut-off values.

OBJECTIVES: Melioidosis, caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, requires intensive antimicrobial treatment. However, standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methodology based on modern principles for determining breakpoints and ascertaining performance of methods are lacking for B. pseudomallei. This study aimed to establish MIC and zone diameter distributions on which to set epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values for B. pseudomallei using standard EUCAST methodology for non-fastidious organisms. METHODS: Non-consecutive, non-duplicate clinical B. pseudomallei isolates (9-70 per centre) were tested at eight study centres against eight antimicrobials by broth microdilution (BMD) and the EUCAST disc diffusion method. Isolates without and with suspected resistance mechanisms were deliberately selected. The EUCAST Development Laboratory ensured the quality of study materials, and provided guidance on performance of the tests and interpretation of results. Aggregated results were analysed according to EUCAST recommendations to determine ECOFFs. RESULTS: MIC and zone diameter distributions were generated using BMD and disc diffusion results obtained for 361 B. pseudomallei isolates. MIC and zone diameter ECOFFs (mg/L; mm) were determined for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (8; 22), ceftazidime (8; 22), imipenem (2; 29), meropenem (2; 26), doxycycline (2; none), tetracycline (8; 23), chloramphenicol (8; 22) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (4; 28). CONCLUSIONS: We have validated the use of standard BMD and disc diffusion methodology for AST of B. pseudomallei. The MIC and zone diameter distributions generated in this study allowed us to establish MIC and zone diameter ECOFFs for the antimicrobials studied. These ECOFFs served as background data for EUCAST to set clinical MIC and zone diameter breakpoints for B. pseudomallei.

How to interpret MICs of antifungal compounds according to the revised clinical breakpoints v. 10.0 European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (EUCAST).

BACKGROUND: EUCAST has revised the definition of the susceptibility category I from 'Intermediate' to 'Susceptible, Increased exposure'. This implies that I can be used where the drug concentration at the site of infection is high, either because of dose escalation or through other means to ensure efficacy. Consequently, I is no longer used as a buffer zone to prevent technical factors from causing misclassifications and discrepancies in interpretations. Instead, an Area of Technical Uncertainty (ATU) has been introduced for MICs that cannot be categorized without additional information as a warning to the laboratory that decision on how to act has to be made. To implement these changes, the EUCAST-AFST (Subcommittee on Antifungal Susceptibility Testing) reviewed all, and revised some, clinical antifungal breakpoints. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to present an overview of the current antifungal breakpoints and supporting evidence behind the changes. SOURCES: This document is based on the ten recently updated EUCAST rationale documents, clinical breakpoint and breakpoint ECOFF documents. CONTENT: The following breakpoints (in mg/L) have been revised or established for Candida species: micafungin against C. albicans (ATU = 0.03); amphotericin B (S ≤/> R = 1/1), fluconazole (S ≤/> R = 2/4), itraconazole (S ≤/> R = 0.06/0.06), posaconazole (S ≤/> R = 0.06/0.06) and voriconazole (S ≤/> R = 0.06/0.25) against C. dubliniensis; fluconazole against C. glabrata (S ≤/> R = 0.001/16); and anidulafungin (S ≤/> R = 4/4) and micafungin (S ≤/> R = 2/2) against C. parapsilosis. For Aspergillus, new or revised breakpoints include itraconazole (ATU = 2) and isavuconazole against A. flavus (S ≤/> R = 1/2, ATU = 2); amphotericin B (S ≤/> R = 1/1), isavuconazole (S ≤ /> R = 1/2, ATU = 2), itraconazole (S ≤/> R = 1/1, ATU = 2), posaconazole (ATU = 0.25) and voriconazole (S ≤/> R = 1/1, ATU = 2) against A. fumigatus; itraconazole (S ≤/> R = 1/1, ATU = 2) and voriconazole (S ≤/> R = 1/1, ATU = 2) against A. nidulans; amphotericin B against A. niger (S ≤/> R = 1/1); and itraconazole (S ≤/> R = 1/1, ATU = 2) and posaconazole (ATU = 0.25) against A. terreus. IMPLICATIONS: EUCAST-AFST has released ten new documents summarizing existing and new breakpoints and MIC ranges for control strains. A failure to adopt the breakpoint changes may lead to misclassifications and suboptimal or inappropriate therapy of patients with fungal infections.

Daptomycin in the treatment of enterococcal bloodstream infections and endocarditis: a EUCAST position paper.

SCOPE: This position paper describes the view adopted by EUCAST on the role of daptomycin in the treatment of serious infections caused by Enterococcus species. BACKGROUND: High-dose daptomycin is considered effective in the treatment of enterococcal bloodstream infection (BSI) and endocarditis, although published clinical experience with the latter condition is limited. METHODS: EUCAST reviewed the available published data on pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD), resistance selection, clinical efficacy and safety for the use of 10-12 mg/kg/day of daptomycin for these conditions, noting that the doses licensed by the European Medicines Agency are only 4-6 mg/kg/day, and only for infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The PK-PD evidence shows that, even with doses of 10-12 mg/kg/day, it is not possible to treat infections caused by isolates at the upper end of the wild-type distributions of Enterococcus faecalis (with MICs of 4 mg/L) and E. faecium (with MICs of 4 or 8 mg/L). For this reason, and because there are ongoing issues with the reliability of laboratory testing, EUCAST lists daptomycin breakpoints for Enterococcus species as "IE"-insufficient evidence. EUCAST advises increased vigilance in the use of high-dose of daptomycin to treat enterococcal BSI and endocarditis. Additional PK-PD studies and prospective efficacy and safety studies of serious Enterococcal infections treated with high-dose daptomycin may permit the setting of breakpoints in the future.

EUCAST evaluation of 21 brands of Mueller-Hinton dehydrated media for disc diffusion testing.

OBJECTIVES: Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar is recommended by EUCAST and CLSI for disc diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Using EUCAST methodology, we evaluated the performance of 21 internationally available brands of dehydrated MH agar from 17 manufacturers. METHODS: MH plates were prepared in-house and evaluated against four quality control (QC) strains tested in triplicate, using EUCAST disc diffusion methodology. This resulted in 30 disc-QC strain combinations and 90 readings per MH brand. All brands were tested blindly and in parallel. Results were evaluated against targets and ranges in the EUCAST QC tables. The agar depth, pH and concentration of five cations were measured for all brands. RESULTS: Six brands of MH agar (Bio-Rad, Biolife, Oxoid, Sigma MH 2, BD BBL MH II and CRITERION) demonstrated excellent performance, with ≥99% of zone diameter readings within QC ranges and ≥70% on target ±1 mm. The poorest performance was seen for Biolab and Merck MH, with 10% (9/90) and 23% (21/90) of readings outside the QC ranges, respectively. Of all readings, 4.9% (93/1890) were out of range, mainly related to trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (n = 25), aminoglycosides (n = 25) and fluoroquinolones (n = 15). The cation content differed considerably between the agars, and for four brands pH values were outside the acceptable range 7.2-7.4. DISCUSSIONS: This study evaluated the performance and content of 21 brands of MH dehydrated media. Six brands showed excellent performance with all investigated antimicrobial classes. Others exhibited problems with one or more classes of agents. This could partly be explained by differences in concentration of specific chemical components and pH.

EUCAST disc diffusion criteria for the detection of mecA-Mediated ß-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius: oxacillin versus cefoxitin.

OBJECTIVES: Until recently, the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommended the cefoxitin disc to screen for mecA-mediated ß-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. A recent study indicated that cefoxitin was inferior to oxacillin in this respect. We have re-evaluated cefoxitin and oxacillin discs for screening for methicillin resistance in S. pseudintermedius. METHODS: We included 224 animal and human S. pseudintermedius isolates from Europe (n = 108) and North America (n = 116), of which 109 were mecA-positive. Disc diffusion was performed per EUCAST recommendations using 30-µg cefoxitin and 1-µg oxacillin discs from three manufacturers and Mueller-Hinton agar from two manufacturers. RESULTS: Cefoxitin inhibition zones ranged from 6 to 33 mm for mecA-positive S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) and from 29 to 41 mm for mecA-negative S. pseudintermedius (MSSP). The corresponding oxacillin zone intervals were 6-20 mm and 19-30 mm. For cefoxitin 16% (95% CI 14.8-18.0%) of the isolates were in the area where positive and negative results overlapped. For oxacillin the corresponding number was 2% (1.6-2.9%). For oxacillin a breakpoint of susceptible (S) ≥ 20 mm and resistant (R) <20 mm resulted in only 0.4% and 1.1% very major error and major error rates respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation confirms that the 1-µg oxacillin disc predicts mecA-mediated methicillin resistance in S. pseudintermedius better than the 30-µg cefoxitin disc. For a 1-µg oxacillin disc we propose that 20 mm should be used as cut off for resistance, i.e. isolates with a zone diameter <20 mm are resistant to all ß-lactam antibiotics except those with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

The quality of antimicrobial discs from nine manufacturers-EUCAST evaluations in 2014 and 2017.

OBJECTIVES: Antimicrobial discs for susceptibility testing can be obtained from many manufacturers. We evaluated the quality of discs from nine manufacturers in 2014 and 2017. METHODS: Antimicrobial discs of 16 agents from nine manufacturers were evaluated using EUCAST criteria. Discs were tested in triplicate on Müller-Hinton medium against EUCAST quality control (QC) strains. Mean values were compared with targets and ranges in the EUCAST QC tables. RESULTS: Three manufacturers (Becton Dickinson, Mast and Oxoid) demonstrated excellent and consistent disc quality both in 2014 and 2017. Manufacturers with discs of inadequate quality improved their results between the two periods. Overall, 92% (795/861) versus 97% (1038/1071) of zone diameter readings were within QC ranges and 58% (497/861) versus 75% (806/1071) were within the QC target ± 1 mm, for the first and second studies, respectively. One manufacturer (HiMedia) had major quality problems with 33% (26/78) of readings out of range in the first study and 17% (20/120) in the second study. Discs from some manufacturers showed unexpected variation in inhibition zone diameters (4-9 mm) for discs within the same vial. CONCLUSIONS: Antimicrobial discs from three of nine manufacturers exhibited excellent and reproducible quality. The discs of the other six manufacturers demonstrated various quality issues, some of which were severe. After presenting the results to manufacturers and users, all managed to improve the quality. Our study points to the need for more stringent criteria for disc manufacturing. Criteria should not only address the nominal potency of discs but also define the end result.

Development of EUCAST zone diameter breakpoints and quality control criteria for ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 µg.

Ceftazidime-avibactam disk studies were performed for disk mass selection and for establishing EUCAST quality control ranges and zone diameter breakpoints. The disk mass study included disk diffusion testing with ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 and 10-6 µg disks and broth microdilution MIC testing for challenge set of 94 Enterobacteriaceae and 45 Pseudomonas aeruginosa. EUCAST SOP 9.0-based QC and MIC-disk correlations studies were followed for development of ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 µg ranges for Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27583, and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603 and for zone diameter breakpoint determination. The ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 and 10-6 µg disks performed similar in comparison to broth microdilution, with zones ≤ 14 mm for all resistant strains. The 10-4 µg disk was selected and used in QC and breakpoint studies. There was minimal variation of ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 µg QC study results between disks, media, and sites. The QC ranges were within 7 mm for all strains. The zone diameter breakpoint study demonstrated good correlation of MIC and disk results. The established zone diameter breakpoints resulted in false susceptible rates of 1.6 and 4.0% for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. EUCAST selected the ceftazidime-avibactam 10-4 µg disk and established QC ranges for E. coli 25922 of 24-30 mm, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 of 21-27 mm, and K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603 of 18-24 mm. The zone diameter breakpoints that correlated best with the MIC breakpoints of susceptible ≤ 8 mg/L and resistant > 8 mg/L were Enterobacteriaceae (S ≥ 13, R < 13 mm) and P. aeruginosa (S ≥ 17, R < 17 mm).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin - evaluation of seven commercial MIC products against standard broth microdilution for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp.

OBJECTIVE: Both EUCAST and CLSI recommend broth microdilution (BMD) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of colistin, but BMD is rarely used in routine microbiology laboratories. The objective of this study was to evaluate five commercially available BMD products and two brands of gradient tests for colistin MIC determination using BMD according to ISO standard 20776-1 as reference. METHODS: Colistin MIC determination was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions on five commercially available BMD products (Sensititre, MICRONAUT-S, MICRONAUT MIC-Strip, SensiTest, and UMIC) and two gradient tests (Etest and MIC Test Strip). Colistin reference MICs were determined using frozen panels according to ISO standard 20776-1. An international collection of Gram-negative bacteria (n=75) with varying levels of colistin susceptibility was tested. RESULTS: The colistin BMD products correlated well with reference tests, in particular for Sensititre and the two MICRONAUT products (essential agreement ≥96%: 66/69 (96%, CI 88-99%), 72/75 (96%, CI 88-99%) and 74/75 (99%, CI 92-100%)). The results were somewhat poorer for the BMD products SensiTest and UMIC: EA 88% (51/58, CI 77-95%) and 82% (61/74, CI 72-89%), respectively), and considerably poorer for the gradient tests (EA 43-71% depending on gradient test and Mueller-Hinton agar manufacturer). The gradient tests generally underestimated colistin MICs, resulting in a significant number of false susceptible results (9-18 of total 75 tests, compared with 1-3 for the BMD products). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, we advise laboratories not to trust gradient tests for colistin susceptibility testing and to use broth microdilution methods for this purpose. There are several commercial broth microdilution tests available and in principle they perform well.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Kingella kingae with broth microdilution and disk diffusion using EUCAST recommended media.

OBJECTIVES: Increasing use of improved culture techniques and sensitive nucleic acid amplification assays have resulted in recognition of Kingella kingae as an important cause of invasive infections in young children, especially in septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, bacteraemia, and endocarditis. In 2016, EUCAST established clinical MIC breakpoints for K. kingae (published in EUCAST Clinical Breakpoint Tables v 7.0, 2017). The present study was carried out to produce MIC-zone diameter correlations for K. kingae on an international collection of isolates, with the aim of suggesting zone diameter breakpoints corresponding to the clinical MIC breakpoints. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for 18 clinically relevant agents on a collection of 159 clinical isolates of K. kingae. Broth microdilution MIC determination and disk diffusion were performed according to EUCAST recommendations for fastidious organisms. RESULTS: The correlation between MICs and zone diameters was good for all agents with EUCAST breakpoints for K. kingae. ß-lactamase was detected in 41 isolates (26%) and these isolates were resistant to aminopenicillins. These isolates were also resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Resistance to tetracyclines was detected in 8% of all isolates. All resistant isolates were correctly categorized for these agents with the proposed zone diameter breakpoints. One isolate, resistant to erythromycin but susceptible to other macrolides, was categorized as susceptible with erythromycin disk diffusion. No resistance was detected for the cephalosporins, carbapenems, and fluoroquinolones tested. CONCLUSION: Based on the results in this study, zone diameter breakpoints for K. kingae calibrated to EUCAST clinical MIC breakpoints were proposed and approved by EUCAST.

Coeliac disease and invasive pneumococcal disease: a population-based cohort study.

Severe infections are recognized complications of coeliac disease (CD). In the present study we aimed to examine whether individuals with CD are at increased risk of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). To do so, we performed a population-based cohort study including 29 012 individuals with biopsy-proven CD identified through biopsy reports from all pathology departments in Sweden. Each individual with CD was matched with up to five controls (n = 144 257). IPD events were identified through regional and national microbiological databases, including the National Surveillance System for Infectious Diseases. We used Cox regression analyses to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for diagnosed IPD. A total of 207 individuals had a record of IPD whereas 45/29 012 had CD (0·15%) and 162/144 257 were controls (0·11%). This corresponded to a 46% increased risk for IPD [HR 1·46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1·05-2·03]. The risk estimate was similar after adjustment for socioeconomic status, educational level and comorbidities, but then failed to attain statistical significance (adjusted HR 1·40, 95% CI 0·99-1·97). Nonetheless, our study shows a trend towards an increased risk for IPD in CD patients. The findings support results seen in earlier research and taking that into consideration individuals with CD may be considered for pneumococcal vaccination.

The role of whole genome sequencing in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria: report from the EUCAST Subcommittee.

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) offers the potential to predict antimicrobial susceptibility from a single assay. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing established a subcommittee to review the current development status of WGS for bacterial antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). The published evidence for using WGS as a tool to infer antimicrobial susceptibility accurately is currently either poor or non-existent and the evidence / knowledge base requires significant expansion. The primary comparators for assessing genotypic-phenotypic concordance from WGS data should be changed to epidemiological cut-off values in order to improve differentiation of wild-type from non-wild-type isolates (harbouring an acquired resistance). Clinical breakpoints should be a secondary comparator. This assessment will reveal whether genetic predictions could also be used to guide clinical decision making. Internationally agreed principles and quality control (QC) metrics will facilitate early harmonization of analytical approaches and interpretive criteria for WGS-based predictive AST. Only data sets that pass agreed QC metrics should be used in AST predictions. Minimum performance standards should exist and comparative accuracies across different WGS laboratories and processes should be measured. To facilitate comparisons, a single public database of all known resistance loci should be established, regularly updated and strictly curated using minimum standards for the inclusion of resistance loci. For most bacterial species the major limitations to widespread adoption for WGS-based AST in clinical laboratories remain the current high-cost and limited speed of inferring antimicrobial susceptibility from WGS data as well as the dependency on previous culture because analysis directly on specimens remains challenging. For most bacterial species there is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of WGS-inferred AST to guide clinical decision making. WGS-AST should be a funding priority if it is to become a rival to phenotypic AST. This report will be updated as the available evidence increases.

The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: science for intervention.

In the last decade we have witnessed a dramatic increase in the proportion and absolute number of bacterial pathogens resistant to multiple antibacterial agents. Multidrug-resistant bacteria are currently considered as an emergent global disease and a major public health problem. The B-Debate meeting brought together renowned experts representing the main stakeholders (i.e. policy makers, public health authorities, regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies and the scientific community at large) to review the global threat of antibiotic resistance and come up with a coordinated set of strategies to fight antimicrobial resistance in a multifaceted approach. We summarize the views of the B-Debate participants regarding the current situation of antimicrobial resistance in animals and the food chain, within the community and the healthcare setting as well as the role of the environment and the development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, providing expert recommendations to tackle the global threat of antimicrobial resistance.

Little difference between minimum inhibitory concentrations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis wild-type organisms determined with BACTEC MGIT 960 and Middlebrook 7H10.

The MIC wild-type (WT) distribution for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in BACTEC 960 MGIT is not defined, which may result in poor reproducibility for drug susceptibility testing (DST), as several DST methods with different breakpoints are in use. In a comparison between MGIT and Middlebrook 7H10 medium of seven first- and second-line drugs, including 133 MIC determinations of 15 WT isolates, we found an agreement of 91.7% within ± one MIC dilution step. The results confirm the agreement in MIC testing between 7H10 and MGIT and indicate that breakpoints could be harmonized in order to avoid misclassification.

Widespread implementation of EUCAST breakpoints for antibacterial susceptibility testing in Europe.

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) was established to harmonise clinical antimicrobial breakpoints and to define breakpoints for new agents in Europe. Data from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) external quality assessment (EQA) exercises from 2009 to 2012, from the United Kingdom External Quality Assessment Scheme (UK NEQAS) from November 2009 to March 2013 and data collected by EUCAST through a questionnaire in the first quarter of 2013 were analysed to investigate implementation of EUCAST guidelines in Europe. A rapid change to use of EUCAST breakpoints was observed over time. Figures for implementation of EUCAST breakpoints at the end of the studied period were 61.2% from EARSNet data and 73.2% from UK NEQAS data. Responses to the EUCAST questionnaire indicated that EUCAST breakpoints were used by over 50% of laboratories in 18 countries, by 10 to 50% of laboratories in eight countries and by less than 10% in seven countries. The EUCAST disk diffusion method was used by more than 50% of laboratories in 12 countries, by 10 to 50% of laboratories in ten countries and by less than 10% in eleven countries. EUCAST guidelines implementation is essential to ensure consistent clinical reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility results and antimicrobial resistance surveillance.